Opened 17 years ago
Last modified 16 years ago
#1291 assigned defect
skycells needs to allow for overlapping edges.
| Reported by: | kpat.jhu | Owned by: | eugene |
|---|---|---|---|
| Priority: | normal | Milestone: | |
| Component: | Ohana | Version: | |
| Severity: | normal | Keywords: | |
| Cc: |
Description
A buffer of 15 pixels on all edges of the sky cells from the stacks are masked. I found this first in MD08, a quick check by Mark Huber and I of MD09 and MD07 showed the same effect. The anomaly is illustrated on the PS1 wiki at
http://ps1sc.ifa.hawaii.edu/PS1wiki/index.php/Stack_Anomalies#Edges_of_sky_cells_are_masked
The effect was noticed when examining a galaxy at the edge of a sky cell. Examination of the RA,DEC values of the pixels indicates that the sky cells meet seemlessly - little or no gap nor overlap in the vertical edges of the sky cells. However, with this 15 pixels masking of each sky cell edge we lose a strip 6 arcsec wide (2 * 15 * 0.2 arcsec/pixel) of un-imaged sky. It would be good to turn off this unnecessary masking.
In a reply to my original post, Paul-Price noted that some masking is needed for convolution purposes (presumably to remove convolution edge effects). That may be, but it would then seem that a better way to proceed is to make the sky cells bigger and then trim unnecessary masked pixels before making the final product.
Note - I am not familiar with IPP so my pick for "component" is a guess, and I have not picked keywords.
-- Gerhardt Meurer
Change History (2)
comment:1 by , 17 years ago
| Component: | imcombine → Ohana |
|---|---|
| Owner: | changed from to |
| Status: | new → assigned |
comment:2 by , 16 years ago
| Summary: | Edges of cells are masked → skycells needs to allow for overlapping edges. |
|---|

This is due to a current limitation in the 'skycells' command within Ohana.