IPP Software Navigation Tools IPP Links Communication Pan-STARRS Links

Changes between Version 82 and Version 83 of ppSub_testing_201201


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 30, 2012, 10:34:47 PM (14 years ago)
Author:
Mark Huber
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • ppSub_testing_201201

    v82 v83  
    339339
    340340= Extra IPP/Photpipe Comparison Set 20120417 =
    341 Not sure which section this will be worked into (probably monitoring as HP comparisons when finished working through and writing up the primary test/monitor set). None in particular specified, so picked a few maybe possible ones from the QUB single convolution issue page at http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/ps1/psdb/userlist/5/
    342  * seem to be primarly i,z-band showing issue and many on outer FPA.
    343  * sInce primarily setup for the MD04 skycell.051-058 stripe, picking ones from there.
     341Not sure which section this will be worked into (probably monitoring as photpipe/HP comparisons when finished working through and writing up the primary test/monitor set). None in particular specified, so picked a few maybe possible ones from the QUB single convolution issue page at http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/ps1/psdb/userlist/5/
     342 * listing seem to be primarly i,z-band examples and many on outer FPA.
     343 * sInce primarily setup for the MD04 skycell.051-058 stripe, randomly picking ones from there to setup in i/z as well.
     344
     345event 1 -- http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/ps1/psdb/candidate/1100317551021456600/
     346
     347event 2 -- http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/ps1/psdb/candidate/1100303971022245500/
     348
     349event 3 -- http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/ps1/psdb/candidate/1100544881021529400/
    344350
    345351{{{
    346 1 -- http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/ps1/psdb/candidate/1100317551021456600/
    347 2 -- http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/ps1/psdb/candidate/1100303971022245500/
    348 3 -- http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/ps1/psdb/candidate/1100544881021529400/
    349 
    350 1= md04s052_42 (z55935)+i56027+z55997  = 10:03:17.55, 02:14:56.6
    351 2= md04s053_41 (i55985)+z56010+z55997+i55950 (1/24 have already run before?)  = 10:03:03.97, 02:22:45.5
    352 3= md04s051_41 (z56005)+i56007+i56001  = 10:05:44.88, +2:15:29.4
    353 
     352event = photpipe chopped skycell  and  filter/date = coordinates
     3531= md04s052_42 z/55935+i/56027+z/55997                = 10:03:17.55, 02:14:56.6
     3542= md04s053_41 i/55985+z56010+z/55997+i/55950   = 10:03:03.97, 02:22:45.5
     3553= md04s051_41 z/56005+i/56007+i/56001                 = 10:05:44.88, +2:15:29.4
     356
     357filter: MJD = date
    354358z: 55935,55997,56005,56010 = 1/9/12, 3/11, 3/19, 3/24
    355359i: 55985,56001,56007,56027 = 2/28/12, 3/15, 3/21, 4/10
     
    607611md04s053.i.ut120410f.855722_44_i.templf.450166_44.diff.dcmp IMAGE___
    608612
    609 
    610613images rsync'd with normal photpipe data structure under (when finished)
    611  * workspace_tmpl convolved template (default),  workspace_auto for photpipe/HP choice
     614 * workspace_tmpl -- convolved template (default)
     615 * workspace_auto -- photpipe/HP choice direction
    612616/data/ipp059.0/mhuber/testppsub120417_md04/photpipe/
    613617
     
    655659MD04.V3.skycell.053.stk.855722.unconv.20120410.fpa.cmf 3.550875 3.036315 i.00000
    656660
    657 images under by the night date YYYYMMDD:
    658  * SS_1 forced input convolution, SS_2 forced reference convolution (default)
    659 /data/ipp059.0/mhuber/testppsub120417_md04/ops_base
     661images under by the night date YYYYMMDD with the convolution choice in the filename:
     662 * SS_2 -- forced reference convolution (default)
     663 * SS_1 -- forced input convolution
     664/data/ipp059.0/mhuber/testppsub120417_md04/ops_base/YYYYMMDD
    660665
    661666}}}
     
    673678||  ||  ||  ||
    674679
     680Like before, not seeing clear improvement by convolving the image with ppSub and even in the photpipe case if the convolution choice was turned on doesn't appear to be much improved either.
     681
     682Also not seeing a clear indication that photpipe/HP is doing much better, though photometry stats on these would be useful to compare.
     683
     684And not that there aren't issues that need tweaking (top of page) as well.
     685
     686
     687
    675688 
    676689 
     690