Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of ppSub_testing_201201

Timestamp:

Jan 25, 2012, 2:10:59 PM (15 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

ppSub_testing_201201

@@ -3 +3 @@
 [[PageOutline]]
 
-= Background = 
+Primary purpose is to wrap up and activate the convolution direction choice in ppSub.
+
+Secondary purpose is to monitor if working as expected and address any additional issues (convolution troubles) and baseline to verify against any future changes in code (test set). 
+
+
+== Background == 
 Samples of previous information/work/comparisons 
 
@@ -19 +24 @@
 
 
-
-= Primary: convolution direction choice = 
-Primary purpose is to wrap up and activate the convolution direction choice in ppSub.
+= Convolution direction choice = 
+We want to avoid large deconvolution in PSF-matching image subtraction. As the image quality of the images continues to improve, always convolving the reference stack will not produce the best difference image and convolving the input image is desired. The quality of the difference image is evaluated in both directions and the better is chosen for the output (add specific details).
 
 Current branch for testing the choice of convolution direction and is updated to r33098 (from 1/11/2012)
  * http://svn.pan-starrs.ifa.hawaii.edu/trac/ipp/browser/branches/meh_branches/ppsub_test
-== QUB samples ==
- * http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/ps1/psdb/userlist/10/
- * http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/ps1/psdb/userlist/5/?sort=-followup_flag_date
 
-== Test samples ==
+
+== Selected Test Samples ==
+
+Initial test for if choosing the proper direction in stack-stack diffims now using MD04. Was initially done using MD10, but we want to continue to build up test samples over other IPP codes using MD04.
 
 || ''' ''' || ''' ''' || '''''' ||
@@ -38 +42 @@
 || [[Image(test.png,300px)]] || [[Image(test.png,300px)]] ||
 
-= Secondary: monitor  = 
-Secondary purpose is to monitor if working as expected and address any additional issues (convolution troubles) and baseline to verify against any future changes in code (test set). 
 
-== Nightly tests of direction ==
+Need tests to verify changes will not break diffims for other surveys (MOPS etc) but do not need to worry about magic now:
+ * simulated images
+ * warp-warp diffim - MD and 3PI TTI
+ * warp-stack diffim - MD and LAP stack
 
 
-== hotpants comparisons == 
 
+=== QUB exmples of wrong convolution choice ===
+ * http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/ps1/psdb/userlist/10/
+ * http://star.pst.qub.ac.uk/ps1/psdb/userlist/5/?sort=-followup_flag_date
+
+Not all seem to be due to convolving in the wrong direction and need to identify and separate the cases/causes if can.
+
+
+=== CfA photpipe/HOTPANTs direction ===
+Using single template/reference stack so locally get keyword CONVOL00 from header except slight issue with amps.
+
+
+= Monitoring = 
+
+== Nightly tests of convolution direction ==
+Is there any conflict with the expected desired direction? Compare to CfA photpipe, detection counts.
+ * having IQ/FWHM keywords in stack images or at least the gpc1 DB would be helpful here since are calc for the PSF matching in the diffim
+
+== HOTPANTs comparisons == 
+Difficult to automate, but are the diffims continuing to produce similar results.
+
+