Changes between Version 123 and Version 124 of ppSub_testing_201201

Timestamp:

May 24, 2012, 9:23:52 PM (14 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

ppSub_testing_201201

@@ -806 +806 @@
 ||  [[Image(1_md04s052.i.20120410_ipp_dophot_det_panel.jpg,300px)]] ||
  
+
+= Extra IPP/Photpipe Calibration Catalogs 20120524 =
+Ken Smith looked into the new ubercal calibration of the IPP images in terms of the diffim photometry in comparison to the photpipe photometry.
+
+http://ps1sc.ifa.hawaii.edu/PS1wiki/index.php/DRAVG_telecon#Post-Ubercal_Diffs
+
+
+Photpipe catalogs (from Sept. 2011): basic ASCII tables, header line 1.
+
+http://orac.ifa.hawaii.edu/ipp_tests/md_abscat110912_120524
+
+IPP refcat/ubercal from May 2012: dump of the current refcat.20120503 for the MD field region using getstar into FITS tables. The MAG_C1,MAG_C2 columns are for each filter
+ * g: g,i
+ * r: r,i
+ * i: r,i
+ * z: i,z
+ * y: z,y
  
+http://orac.ifa.hawaii.edu/ipp_tests/md_refcat20120503v0_120524
+
+
+||  [[Image(md04_gi_photrefcat_sample120524.png,300px)]] || ||
+
+
 = Extra IPP Comparison Set 20120516 =
  
@@ -842 +865 @@
 || || || ||
 
+Diffims are not necessarily better for convolving the other direction. More often than not seems the psphot detections of the source of interest is dropped from the inverting of the core flux, but not for all detections.