Changes between Version 111 and Version 112 of ppSub_testing_201201

Timestamp:

May 8, 2012, 9:37:46 AM (14 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

ppSub_testing_201201

@@ -722 +722 @@
 ops_base/20120319/MD04.V3.skycell.051.stk.837639.unconv.SS_2.20120319.fits 
 ops_base/20120319/MD04.V3.skycell.051.stk.837639.unconv.SS_1.20120319.fits 
-(ops is quick name for the current ops tag used, ipp-20120404)
+(ops means the current ops tag used, ipp-20120404)
 
 -- photpipe diffims (convolved template, auto choice):
@@ -735 +735 @@
 
 ----
+
 == Comparison Panels ==
 
-Quick+dirty example image cutouts - panels left to right include IPP convolved refstack (default), IPP convolved input stack test, photpipe convolved TEMPLATE, photpipe convolved IMAGE or TEMPLATE by best choice, maybe a photpipe IMAGE input stack and maybe a photpipe TEMPLATE stack.  
+Quick+dirty example image cutouts - panels left to right include IPP convolved refstack (default), IPP convolved input stack test, photpipe convolved TEMPLATE, photpipe convolved IMAGE or TEMPLATE by best choice (i.e., auto), maybe a photpipe IMAGE input stack and maybe a photpipe TEMPLATE stack.  
  
 || '''event #:date''' ||  '''IPP SS_2 (def)''' | '''IPP SS_1''' | '''photpipe/HP TEMPLATE (def)''' | '''photpipe/HP auto'''  | '''photpipe IMAGE stack''' | '''photpipe TEMPLATE stack''' || '''notes''' ||
@@ -745 +746 @@
 || 3:20120319 || [[Image(3_md04s051.z.20120319_ipp_photpipe_diffim_panelstack.jpg,1200px)]] || HP would pick IMAGE  ||
 || 3:20120321 || [[Image(3_md04s051.i.20120321_ipp_photpipe_diffim_panel.jpg,1200px)]]  || HP would pick TEMPLATE  ||
-|| 2:20120324 || [[Image(2_md04s053.z.20120324_ipp_photpipe_diffim_panel.jpg,1200px)]]  || HP would pick TEMPLATE. odd ppSub re-run problem, not same as original run..  ||
+|| 2:20120324 || [[Image(2_md04s053.z.20120324_ipp_photpipe_diffim_panel.jpg,1200px)]]  || HP would pick TEMPLATE. odd ppSub re-run problem, clearly not same as original run..  ||
 || 1:20120410 || [[Image(1_md04s052.i.20120410_ipp_photpipe_diffim_panel.jpg,1200px)]]  || HP would pick IMAGE  ||
 ||  ||  ||  ||
@@ -753 +754 @@
  * Not seeing a clear indication that photpipe/HP is doing much better, though photometry+detection stats on these would be useful to compare (and not that there aren't issues that need tweaking noted top of page as well).
 
-* '''Any additional specific, better  examples from Ken/Stephen?'''
+
+'''Any additional specific, better  examples from Ken/Stephen?'''
 
 
 Diffim detections: 
 
-photpipe detection level set to s/n>=3 (ipp set to >=5). photpipe detections are swamped at the low level, but don't consider the typical residual a true source (dophot setting?). photpipe auto-choice for IMAGE tends to produce more low-level detections.
+Photpipe detection level set to lower S/N>=3 (IPP set to >=5). Photpipe detections are swamped at the low level, but don't often consider the typical residual a true source. Photpipe auto-choice for IMAGE tends to produce more low-level detections and not always better as expected.
 
 ||  [[Image(1_md04s052.i.20120410_ipp_photpipe_diffim_det_panel.jpg,1200px)]] || 1:20120410, i-filter, photpipe chose IMAGE ||
@@ -764 +766 @@
 ||  [[Image(1_md04s052.z.20120109_ipp_photpipe_diffim_det_panel.jpg,1200px)]] || 1:20120109, z-filter, photpipe chose IMAGE ||
 || || ||
-|| from left to right: IPP SS_2 default (convolved refstack), IPP SS_1 (convolved input), photpipe (convolved TEMPLATE), photpipe (auto) ||  ||
-|| blue for IPP are the "good' detections using X flags, green for the photpipe is the basic cuts (including the dipole stat cuts) ||  ||
-
-ppSub re-run of samples were not producing the same detections, particularly the ones in question. Re-running with the same SEED however does. could make using the dipole stats difficult to tune.
+|| from left to right: IPP SS_2 default (convolved refstack), IPP SS_1 (convolved input stack), photpipe (convolved TEMPLATE), photpipe (auto) ||  ||
+|| blue for IPP are the good detections using flags from [wiki:QUBTCSIPPFlags], green for the photpipe is the basic cuts (including the dipole stat cuts) ||  ||
+
+
+ppSub re-run of samples were not producing the same detections, particularly the ones in question. Re-running with the same SEED however does. Could make using the dipole stats difficult to tune.
  
 ||  [[Image(1_md04s052.i.20120410_ipp_photpipe_diffim_orig_det_panel.jpg,1200px)]] ||
@@ -773 +776 @@
 || blue=IPP detections with good flags, red=photpipe detections all, green=photpipe detections cut (dipole stats etc) ||
  
-uncompressing and descaling the IPP diffim into something like what can run through something like the dophot photpipe uses results in not finding or keeping as a detection either..
+
+Uncompressing and descaling the IPP diffim into something like what can run through something like the dophot that photpipe uses results in not finding or keeping as a detection the target in question either.
 
 ||  [[Image(1_md04s052.i.20120410_ipp_dophot_det_panel.jpg,300px)]] ||