Changes between Version 103 and Version 104 of ppStack_testing_201111

Timestamp:

Apr 16, 2012, 3:05:40 PM (14 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

ppStack_testing_201111

@@ -448 +448 @@
 }}}
 
-Fixes r-band issue, others mostly unaffected. Looks to be now a question of tracing the target PSF selection process for the g-band and the extra growth on i-band.
-
-
-Could affect other code/stages tuned params, need to check before adding to trunk+tag -- nothing drastic in samples so added fix.
-
+Fixes r-band issue, others mostly unaffected. Could affect other code/stages tuned params, need to check before adding to trunk+tag -- nothing drastic in samples so added fix.
+
+Looks to be now a question of tracing the target PSF selection process for the g-band and the extra growth on i-band. Becoming an additional branch of investigation related to the IQ of the inputs going into the stacks that the PSF envelope solution is made from and need to trace down to individual inputs.
+
+Break up into groups, then break into smaller sub-sets the groups having issues.
+s055g:
+
+
+
+s055i:
+While the FWHM~7.1, the convolved images have FWHM~9-10 generally.
+{{{
+FILENAME                                         FWHM_MAJ IQ_FW1
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.0.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf   10.47247 8.178617
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.1.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf   11.10159 8.916221
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.10.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf  9.585663 8.479208
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.100.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf 10.89854 8.851029
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.101.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf 10.68771 8.692747
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.102.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf 10.64534 8.854232
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.103.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf 9.786881 9.003357
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.104.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf 10.20106 8.508514
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.105.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf 10.36447 8.872278
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.106.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf 11.17089 8.858175
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.107.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf 11.02701 9.404055
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.108.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf 10.61196 8.608229
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.109.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf 11.64145 8.561131
+mem400_deepstack.ppstack.11.conv.im.pht.fpa.cmf  10.83251 8.612485
+}}}
+
+ * Break into sub-groups of different sizes (default is ~100 inputs)
+{{{
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s1sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 6.948271
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s2sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 7.983406
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s3sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 8.228301
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s4sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 7.010231
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s1sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 7.771870,7.675667 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s2sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 8.531821,8.457088 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s3sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 8.927197,8.827012 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s4sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 8.465529,8.424333 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s1s200sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 7.993505
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s1s300sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 8.162872
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s1s400sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 7.128121
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s1s200sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 8.951500,8.863860 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s1s300sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 9.282644,9.198133 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s1s400sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 9.053215,9.020257 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s2s200sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 7.011785
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s2s300sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 7.123811
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s2s200sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 8.598989,8.531817 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s2s300sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 8.875980,8.798958 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+}}}
+  * Appears to choose a much better FWHM for more recent data (s4) but overlap of s2s200 versus what a larger FWHM for s3 shows indicates something is going strange in s4.
+
+ * Break sub-groups into sub-sets
+{{{
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s4s1sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 7.462551
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s4s2sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 5.529995
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s4s3sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 6.343721
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s4s4sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 7.060447
+
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s4s1sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 7.691631,7.642853 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s4s2sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 5.841974,5.706679 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s4s3sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 6.399483,6.340310 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s4s4sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 7.731044,7.698786 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+--> so s4s5.. and some s3s3-4 inputs may be involved?
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s4s5sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 6.130914
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s4s5sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 6.409942,6.297189 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s3s3sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 7.966679
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s3s4sub/mem400.log:      Target seeing FWHM: 7.331856
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s3s3sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 8.106666,7.973850 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+mem400_stack_test.fixtest_s055i_s3s4sub/mem400.log:        fwhm (psf): 7.526990,7.406355 (moments): 0.000000,0.000000
+}}}
+
+
+Seems a single odd exposure can drive the target PSF strangely where FWHM~7.1 but sets the convolved images ~9-10.