Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of ZoologyMDField

Timestamp:

Sep 14, 2011, 3:04:47 PM (15 years ago)

Author:

heather

Comment:

--

ZoologyMDField

@@ -4 +4 @@
 == Viewing the Detections == 
 
+(click on the images to see bigger version)
+
+XY27 is the same chip that I used before for investigating false detections, here it is for this image:
+[[Image(XY27.jpg, 800px)]]
+
+XY06
+
+[[Image(xy06.jpg, 120px)]]
+
+XY14
+
+[[Image(xy14.jpg, 120px)]]
+
+XY25
+
+[[Image(xy25.jpg, 120px)]]
+
+The distribution of the false detections appears a bit different for this MD field - previously, there would be entire cells that were just bad. This doesn't seem to happen like it did for the SAS footprint. 
+
+
+== Histograms ==
+
+(click on the images to make bigger)
+
+This is a zoom of XY27 in ds9.  The numbers correspond to the cells that I investigate down below.  Some of these cells had a lot of streakies/and/or/false detections for SAS footprint.
+
+[[Image(ds9.zoom.label.png, 800px)]]
+
+I plotted a histogram of pixel/sqrt(variance) for each of the cells.  The colors are as follows:
+
+ * 1 = red
+ * 2 = orange
+ * 3 = gold
+ * 4 = yellow 
+ * 5 = green
+ * 6 = darkgreen
+ * 7 = blue
+ * 8 = violet
+
+[[Image(allofthem.png, 800px)]]
+
+This already looks a lot different than what was seen for SAS footprint. 
+
+Plotting each of the cells separately and plotting the same with the x axis flipped shows that it's way more symmetric than for SAS:
+
+ * 1 [[Image(1.png, 200px)]]
+ * 2 [[Image(2.png, 200px)]]
+ * 3 [[Image(3.png, 200px)]]
+ * 4 [[Image(4.png, 200px)]]
+ * 5 [[Image(5.png, 200px)]]
+ * 6 [[Image(6.png, 200px)]]
+ * 7 [[Image(7.png, 200px)]]
+ * 8 [[Image(8.png, 200px)]]
+
+All of these plots are for the single chip stage. I am working on doing similar investigations for the stack stage.