Outline

This page outlines an investigation into the cross-matching used by the Durham group to generate the 'true positives' and 'false positives' data subsets. Durham used TOPCAT to perform the cross-match, and presented the results as FITS files. Our aim is to reproduce the same results as Durham then experiment with different cross-matching parameters.

Durham-supplied data

Durham supplied the following files (FITS binary table format) for analysis.

File	Rows	Comments
footprint-stripe82.fits	449,254	Sloan Stripe 82 master file
footprint-g-all-psphot.fits.bz2	282,604	all IPP g filter
footprint-r-all-psphot.fits.bz2	278,280	all IPP r filter
footprint-i-all-psphot.fits.bz2	320,655	all IPP i filter
footprint-z-all-psphot.fits.bz2	258,130	all IPP z filter
footprint-y-all-psphot.fits.bz2	175,578	all IPP y filter
footprint-g-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2	171,973	all IPP false detections in g
footprint-r-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2	67,455	all IPP false detections in r
footprint-i-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2	59,973	all IPP false detections in i
footprint-y-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2	46,729	all IPP false detections in z
footprint-z-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2	51,391	all IPP false detections in y

Durham method

Durham used TOPCAT to perform the cross-matching. They used the following settings:

• 'Algorithm' : Sky
• 'Max Error' : 1.0 arcsec
• 'Match Selection' : Best Match Only

It is thought (by Nigel Metcalfe) that Peter Draper cut the Sloan data on BINNED1 = true. I applied this cut, and it only removed 428 sourced out of a total of 449,254.

Attempts to replicate the Durham method

Using TOPCAT with the same data and same settings as Durham, we get the following. Note that the total number of IPP detections is: 1,315,247

	Durham	Us with Durham settings
True positives	917,726	268,044
False positives	397,521	1,047,203