Changes between Version 21 and Version 22 of ZoologyCrossmatching

Timestamp:

Sep 2, 2011, 3:47:14 PM (15 years ago)

Author:

rhenders

Comment:

--

ZoologyCrossmatching

@@ -5 +5 @@
 
 This page outlines an investigation into the cross-matching used by the Durham group to generate the 'true positives' and 'false positives' data subsets. Durham used TOPCAT to perform the cross-match, and presented the results as FITS files. Our aim is to reproduce the same results as Durham then experiment with different cross-matching parameters. 
+
+= Coverage =
+
+As can be seenfrom the plot below, Sloan stripe 82 does not fully cover the SAS footprint. This needs to be taken into account when performing crossmatching and determining false positives.
+
+[[Image(coverage.gif, 500px)]]
 
 = Durham-supplied data =
@@ -23 +29 @@
 || footprint-z-not-matched-psphot.fits.bz2|| 51,391|| all IPP false detections in y ||
 
-= Coverage =
-
-As can be seenfrom the plot below, Sloan stripe 82 does not fully cover the SAS footprint. This needs to be taken into account when performing crossmatching and determining false positives.
-
-[[Image(coverage.gif)]]
 
 = Durham method =