Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of VarianceMaps
- Timestamp:
- Oct 5, 2011, 6:00:28 PM (15 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
VarianceMaps
v1 v2 7 7 * stack (md and sas) 8 8 9 There are periodic patterns associated with warp and stack , which are not associated with chip.9 There are periodic patterns associated with warp and stack weight maps, which are not seen on the chip weight maps. 10 10 11 11 Here is a zoom of one of the unconv.wt.fits for SAS footprint: (stack_Id= 336346). You can see an odd periodic background. The yellow circles are the false detections. 12 12 [[Image(skycell.1316.089.336346.sas.wt.png)]] 13 13 14 14 Here is a zoom of one of the unconv.wt.fit stacks for a recent MD refstack, it not quite as strange, but still, there is an underlying odd, periodic background. 15 [[Image(md01.wt.png)]] 15 16 17 Chip stage weight maps do not have this background (click to zoom in, this is for chip_id 310753 and XY53) 16 18 17 Chip stage does not have this background (click to zoom in) 19 The full chip: 18 20 19 || chip || chip.wt || 21 [[Image(xy53ch310753.png)]] 22 23 The weight map of one of the cells in XY53 24 25 [[Image(chip.wt.png)]] 26 27 The detrended fits of that same cell in XY53 28 29 [[Image(chip.png)]] 20 30 21 31 22 32 Warp stage (for the same chip) has a very strange background for the weight map (click to zoom in) 23 33 34 One of the skycells (the weight map, same exposure, same cell, but warp stage) 24 35 25 || warp || warp.wt || 36 [[Image(warp.wt.png)]] 37 38 A zoom of the weight map for that cell - the background has a periodic pattern 39 40 [[Image(warp.wt.zoom.png)]] 41 42 And one of the warps (same cell, it looks okay) 43 44 [[Image(warp.png)]] 45 46 We think something weird is happening with the variance/weight maps in the warp stage - this might cause the funny false detections in the SAS.footprints, and likely causes problems elsewhere...
