Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of Stackphot_20100514

Timestamp:

May 17, 2010, 4:56:22 PM (16 years ago)

Author:

eugene

Comment:

--

Stackphot_20100514

@@ -14 +14 @@
 There are two sets of files in this directory:
 
-* MD04.skycell.079.stk.* : these are the inputs to the stackphot analysis
-* MD04.skycell.079.stkphot.* : these are the outputs from the stackphot analysis.
+ * MD04.skycell.079.stk.* : these are the inputs to the stackphot analysis
+ * MD04.skycell.079.stkphot.* : these are the outputs from the stackphot analysis.
 
 The analysis was performed using the griz images from the current
@@ -104 +104 @@
 the radii defined by SDSS.  The inner and outer radii in pixels are
 listed below:
+
 {{{
 @RADIAL.ANNULAR.BINS.LOWER           F32     0.00 0.56 1.69 2.59 4.41 7.51 11.58 18.58 28.55 45.50  70.51 110.53 172.49 269.52 420.51
@@ -111 +112 @@
 Some points and caveats:
 
-* unlike SDSS, we are currently using the Petrosian flux measured on a
+ * unlike SDSS, we are currently using the Petrosian flux measured on a
  given image to determine R50 and R90 for that image (SDSS uses the
  r-band)
-* the average object positions are used to measure the radial, not
+ * the average object positions are used to measure the radial, not
  r-band specifically like SDSS
-* we do not currently resample and recenter the source pixels to place
+ * we do not currently resample and recenter the source pixels to place
  the center at a pixel center (as photo does).  this should only be an
  important effect in the inner ~2 pixels if the image is nearly
  undersampled (which we clearly are not).
-* the zero points are not being carried into the stack correctly, so
+ * the zero points are not being carried into the stack correctly, so
  the photometry is NOT currently calibrated.  The data in the sample is
  from MD04, which overlaps SDSS, so it should be easy to calibrate from
  SDSS.
-* the astrometric calibration is being applied to the output 'cmf'
+ * the astrometric calibration is being applied to the output 'cmf'
  tables, but the WCS seems to be broken in the header
-* there is a bit of work still needed to integrate the analysis into
+ * there is a bit of work still needed to integrate the analysis into
  the IPP automatically.
-* non-linear model fits are still not being included in the analysis
+ * non-linear model fits are still not being included in the analysis