Changes between Version 6 and Version 7 of QUB_SV_21012010_templates
- Timestamp:
- Jan 21, 2010, 8:48:16 AM (16 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
QUB_SV_21012010_templates
v6 v7 5 5 6 6 7 Stack for testing MD03 8 [[BR]] 7 '''Stack for testing on skycell with good target already selected ''' [[BR]] 9 8 10 g skycell.043 stack.[[BR]]9 '''MD03''' [[BR]] 11 10 12 r skycell.043 stack.39693[[BR]]11 '''g skycell.043 stack.'''[[BR]] 13 12 14 i skycell.043 stack.[[BR]] 13 '''r skycell.043 stack.39693'''[[BR]] 14 15 '''i skycell.043 stack.'''[[BR]] 15 16 16 17 … … 72 73 [[Image(MD04.png, 800px)]][[BR]] 73 74 74 ''' Summary steps'''[[BR]]75 Here is all the step I'm doing what I'm doing: [[BR]] 75 76 76 77 * Download all new stacks in the archive[[BR]] … … 80 81 * Compare the following parameters from cmf files: [[BR]] 81 82 82 PSF magnitudes vs aperture magntude [[BR]]83 PSF magnitudes vs aperture magntude [[BR]] 83 84 84 moment along x vs moment along y [[BR]] 85 moment along x vs moment along y [[BR]] 86 87 minimum fwhm vs major fwhm [[BR]] 85 88 86 minimum fwhm vs major fwhm [[BR]]87 89 [[Image(MD04.skycell.044.stk.41186.cmf_1.png, 400px)]][[BR]] 88 90 [[Image(MD04.skycell.099.stk.38684.cmf_1.png, 400px)]][[BR]] … … 98 100 The average values for each skycell is computed rejecting at 3 sigma (5 iterations) [[BR]] 99 101 100 I'm comparing the values of these parameters in each filters and each field [[BR]]102 * I'm comparing the values of these parameters in each filters and each field [[BR]] 101 103 102 taking a look by eyes some of the skycells of the best epochs, I choose the best templates [[BR]]104 * taking a look by eyes some of the skycells of the best epochs, I choose the best templates [[BR]] 103 105 104 106 some epochs with small fwhm and moments (in principle good templates) seem to be masked too much [[BR]] 105 107 106 [[Image( , 400px)]][[BR]]108 [[Image(MD02.skycell.066.stk.36184.unconv.jpg, 400px)]][[BR]] 107 109 108 I tested ppSub with the templates selected [[BR]] 110 * Finally, I'm testing ppSub with the templates selected [[BR]] 111 109 112 [[Image(MD02.skycell.102.stk.40977.unconv.dif.jpg, 400px)]][[BR]] 110 113 111 114 [[BR]] 112 115 113 MD03 skycell 066 and 102 in 2 different nights[[BR]]116 '''STEP 3'''[[BR]] 114 117 115 For skycell 066 the first night is a very good template, while for skycell 102 the stack in not good. [[BR]] 118 The choice of one night as template in each filter is in principle good, but for some skycells is not working:[[BR]] 119 For example: the a good r filter observation of MD03 is the one of JD=55207. It gives very good subtraction for some skycell 120 (eg skycell 066) but there are during the same night other skycell not useful (eg skycell 102). In that case I would suggest to use different night as template for different skycell. In Figure skycell 066 and 102 for 2 good nights. [[BR]] 121 [[Image(test_MD03.jpg, 400px)]][[BR]] 116 122 117 123 118 124 == '''Probably it will be necessary to select for different skycell, different nights (as template)''' == 119 125 126 '''MD03'''[[BR]] 127 128 skycell.066 stack.42029 JD.55207 [[BR]] 120 129 130 skycell.090 stack.42052 JD.55207 [[BR]] 131 132 skycell.102 stack.39714 JD.55183 [[BR]] 133 134 skycell.043 stack.39693 JD.55183 [[BR]] 135 136 ......... 137
