Changes between Version 4 and Version 5 of QUB_SV_21012010_templates

Timestamp:

Jan 21, 2010, 8:18:10 AM (16 years ago)

Author:

kpat.uk

Comment:

--

QUB_SV_21012010_templates

@@ -87 +87 @@
 [[Image(MD04.skycell.044.stk.41186.cmf_1.png, 400px)]][[BR]]
 [[Image(MD04.skycell.099.stk.38684.cmf_1.png, 400px)]][[BR]]
-[[Image(MD04.skycell.044.stk.41232.cmf_1.png, 400px)]][[BR]]
-
 
  '''COMMENTS:'''
+
 the unconvolved images have more detections (but probably several of them are not real)
 the FWHM of the objects is degradated in the convolved image (probably too much in some skycells)
@@ -101 +100 @@
  I'm comparing the values of these parameters in each filters and each field  [[BR]]
 
- thaking a look by eyes some of the skycells of the best epochs, I choose the best templates  [[BR]]
+ taking a look by eyes some of the skycells of the best epochs, I choose the best templates  [[BR]]
 
  some epochs with small fwhm and moments (in principle good templates) seem to be masked too much  [[BR]]
 
+[[Image(, 400px)]][[BR]]
 
- MD03 skycell 066 and 102 in 2 different nights [[BR]]
+ [[BR]]
+
+MD03 skycell 066 and 102 in 2 different nights [[BR]]
 
 For skycell 066 the first night is a very good template, while for skycell 102 the stack in not good. [[BR]]