Changes between Version 39 and Version 40 of PSNSC_MOPS

Timestamp:

Feb 6, 2019, 11:20:22 AM (7 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

PSNSC_MOPS

@@ -66 +66 @@
  * 
 
-masking -- has been shown useful for precovery having the masked pixels not removed from the images by reprocessing with masking turned off (label mehtest.nomask, MASK FALSE in hacked CHIP_MASKTEST)
- * overall, masking needs to be re-evaluated as appears to be possibly more aggressive than needed and not use properly in others... -- gpc1 and gpc2 both need thorough static (chip) and dynamic (warp) checking -- recent example o8487g0686o(ota75,05), 
- * masked pixels should be left in the images or in a separate extension and higher level code use use pixels based on mask values -- removal of pixels at start of process prevents any adjusted use of them later in the processing
- * example reprocessing for no mask testing until code changed to leave in all pixels -- 
+masking -- has been shown useful for pre/recovery having the masked pixels not removed from the images by reprocessing with masking turned off 
+ * previously was label mehtest.nomask, MASK FALSE in hacked CHIP_MASKTEST -- 
 {{{
 chiptool -definebyquery -set_label mehtest.nomask  -set_workdir neb://@HOST@.0/meh/mehtest.nomask -set_data_group mehtest.nomask -set_dist_group NULL -set_tess_id RINGS.V3 -set_end_stage warp -set_reduction NOMASKTEST -dbname gpc1 -exp_name XXXXXX
 }}}
+ * new command and config to work on this -- also change to make processing more retained since these are images MOPS makes measurements on to submit to MPC
+{{{
+chiptool -definebyquery -set_label mops.nomasktest  -set_workdir neb://@HOST@.0/gpc1/mops.nomasktest -set_data_group mops.nomasktest -set_dist_group NULL -set_tess_id RINGS.V3 -set_end_stage warp -set_reduction NOMASKTEST -dbname gpc1 -exp_name XXXXX
+}}}
+ * overall, masking needs to be re-evaluated as appears to be possibly more aggressive than needed and not use properly in others... -- gpc1 and gpc2 both need thorough static (chip) and dynamic (warp) checking -- recent example o8487g0686o(ota75,05), 
+ * masked pixels should be left in the images or in a separate extension and higher level code use use pixels based on mask values -- removal of pixels at start of process prevents any adjusted use of them later in the processing
+
 
 WS diffims for MOPS --