= Summary of MOPS_IASC20130319_tests130422 =
[[PageOutline]]

Comparison of MOPS diffim discoveries to IASC visual chip inspection for OSS.20130319

Related summary pages:
 * [wiki:MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004]
 * [wiki:ppSub_testing_201201]
 * [wiki:MOPS_diff_false_positives] 
 * 


MOPS/IASC sample exposures to compare to (162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1-4, quad) stage _id:
{{{
| exp_id | exp_name    | dateobs             | comment                           |
+--------+-------------+---------------------+-----------------------------------+
| 590994 | o6370g0351o | 2013-03-19 11:37:26 | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1 | 
| 591016 | o6370g0373o | 2013-03-19 11:59:29 | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 2 | 
| 591038 | o6370g0395o | 2013-03-19 12:21:39 | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 3 | 
| 591060 | o6370g0417o | 2013-03-19 12:43:52 | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 4 |
}}}

{{{
| exp_name    | comment                           | chip_id | warp_id |
+-------------+-----------------------------------+---------+---------+
| o6370g0351o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1 |  803498 |  759973 | 
| o6370g0373o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 2 |  803520 |  759994 | 
| o6370g0395o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 3 |  803542 |  760016 | 
| o6370g0417o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 4 |  803564 |  760040 | 
}}}

{{{
| diff_id | warp1  | warp2  | data_group   |
+---------+--------+--------+--------------+
|  406579 | 759973 | 759994 | OSS.20130319 |  -- v1-v2 pos, v2-v1 neg
|  406688 | 760016 | 760040 | OSS.20130319 |  -- v3-v4 pos, v4-v3 neg
}}}


Related MOPS czar pages: http://mopshq2.ifa.hawaii.edu/czar/psmops_ps1_mdrm152/tracklets.html?sort=d&limit=100&nn=56369&minv=0.1&sm=162.OSS.O&run_id=831


Datastore products:
{{{
pub.791526.diff.406579	2013-03-19T14:01:22Z	IPP-MOPS	162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1 	o6370g0351o	o6370g0373o
pub.791568.diff.406688	2013-03-19T15:17:53Z	IPP-MOPS	162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 3 	o6370g0395o	o6370g0417o

3330813323.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.pos.mops
3330814731.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.neg.mops

3331155060.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791568.pos.mops
3331158431.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791568.neg.mops
}}}



----

= MOPS to IASC object comparison = 

Missed IASC objects within ~2" in the diffims: ~30% !!
{{{
o6370g0351o	o6370g0373o
3330813323.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.pos.mops = 147/514
3330814731.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791526.neg.mops = 168/523

o6370g0395o	o6370g0417o
3331155060.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791568.pos.mops = 170/519
3331158431.gpc1_IPP-MOPS-TEST_IPP-MOPS-TEST.791568.neg.mops = 169/505
}}}


''Need MOPS diffim object list to reverse compare..''




== IASC Objects Missed in Diffims (Manual Inspection) ==
Cases for missing matches:
 * S/N too low for detection in diffim -- really two cases and split as 
  * (faint) source just too faint to accomodate the S/N hit in normal diffims (will need additional match to SMF for photerr measurement)
  * (conv) convolution fail and S/N degraded (could be dual convolution or wrong choice in convolving input or just bad convolution) 
 * edge or masked -- really two cases and split as
  * (edge) edges and masks have growth factor from convolution
  * (mask) non-target image has mask so diffim has mask (why WS diffim should be better in addition to S/N)

|| Object || diffim || mode || skycell || ra dec || case type || comment ||
||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||
|| TVPS480 || 791526.pos || 1 || 1278.021 || 185.470925  -3.000194 || faint || not visual in diffim, smudge in warp. SMF detect? ||
|| K11UO3A || 791526.pos || 1 || 1279.019 || 186.089088  -3.404686 || edge and mask || cell edge and mask ||
||  ||  ||  ||  ||  ||


----

= Re-run tests = 

== diffim stats ==
For full OSS.20130319 diffim exposure/skycell sample:
 * convolve input = 1393
 * convolve template/reference/input 2 = 968
 * dual convolution = 179
{{{
-- need cam stage stat summary
      Input FWHM: 4.949776
      Reference FWHM: 5.265106
}}}

Only IASC exposures -- 
 * convolve input = 52, 51 (v1-v2, v3-v4)
 * convolve template/reference/input 2 = 2, 0
 * dual convolution = 3, 6


add rerun details with dual convolution and no-dual convolution (issue is typically no-dual case has different kernel params)?