Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of MOPS_IASC20130319_tests130422
- Timestamp:
- Jun 6, 2013, 11:30:45 AM (13 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
MOPS_IASC20130319_tests130422
v1 v2 6 6 Related summary pages: 7 7 * [wiki:MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004] 8 * [wiki: 8 * [wiki:ppSub_testing_201201] 9 9 * [wiki:MOPS_diff_false_positives] 10 10 * 11 11 12 12 13 MOPS/IASC sample exposures to compare to (162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1-4, quad) :13 MOPS/IASC sample exposures to compare to (162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1-4, quad) stage _id: 14 14 {{{ 15 15 | exp_id | exp_name | dateobs | comment | … … 21 21 }}} 22 22 23 {{{ 24 | exp_name | comment | chip_id | warp_id | 25 +-------------+-----------------------------------+---------+---------+ 26 | o6370g0351o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 1 | 803498 | 759973 | 27 | o6370g0373o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 2 | 803520 | 759994 | 28 | o6370g0395o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 3 | 803542 | 760016 | 29 | o6370g0417o | 162.OSS.O.Q.w ps1_14_2124 visit 4 | 803564 | 760040 | 30 }}} 23 31 24 __need to add related warp_id, diff_id table__ 32 {{{ 33 | diff_id | warp1 | warp2 | data_group | 34 +---------+--------+--------+--------------+ 35 | 406579 | 759973 | 759994 | OSS.20130319 | -- v1-v2 pos, v2-v1 neg 36 | 406688 | 760016 | 760040 | OSS.20130319 | -- v3-v4 pos, v4-v3 neg 37 }}} 25 38 26 39 … … 42 55 43 56 44 45 46 57 ---- 47 58 48 59 = MOPS to IASC object comparison = … … 67 78 == IASC Objects Missed in Diffims (Manual Inspection) == 68 79 Cases for missing matches: 69 * (s/n) S/N too low for detection (will need additional match to SMF for photerr measurement) 70 * edge or masked -- really two cases 80 * S/N too low for detection in diffim -- really two cases and split as 81 * (faint) source just too faint to accomodate the S/N hit in normal diffims (will need additional match to SMF for photerr measurement) 82 * (conv) convolution fail and S/N degraded (could be dual convolution or wrong choice in convolving input or just bad convolution) 83 * edge or masked -- really two cases and split as 71 84 * (edge) edges and masks have growth factor from convolution 72 85 * (mask) non-target image has mask so diffim has mask (why WS diffim should be better in addition to S/N) 73 86 74 || Object || diffim || mode || skycell || ra dec || c omment ||87 || Object || diffim || mode || skycell || ra dec || case type || comment || 75 88 || || || || || || 76 || TVPS480 || 791526.pos || 1 || 1278.021 || 185.470925 -3.000194 || not visual in diffim, smudge in warp. SMF detect? ||77 || K11UO3A || 791526.pos || 1 || 1279.019 || 186.089088 -3.404686 || cell edge and mask ||89 || TVPS480 || 791526.pos || 1 || 1278.021 || 185.470925 -3.000194 || faint || not visual in diffim, smudge in warp. SMF detect? || 90 || K11UO3A || 791526.pos || 1 || 1279.019 || 186.089088 -3.404686 || edge and mask || cell edge and mask || 78 91 || || || || || || 79 92 80 93 94 ---- 81 95 82 96 = Re-run tests = … … 93 107 }}} 94 108 95 Only IASC exposures :96 * convolve input = 97 * convolve template/reference/input 2 = 98 * dual convolution = 109 Only IASC exposures -- 110 * convolve input = 52, 51 (v1-v2, v3-v4) 111 * convolve template/reference/input 2 = 2, 0 112 * dual convolution = 3, 6 99 113 100 114 101 reruns with dual convolution and no-dual convolution (issue is typically no-dual case has different kernel params) 115 add rerun details with dual convolution and no-dual convolution (issue is typically no-dual case has different kernel params)? 102 116 103 117 104
