IPP Software Navigation Tools IPP Links Communication Pan-STARRS Links

Changes between Version 18 and Version 19 of MDdeeptest_pixrej_20140403


Ignore:
Timestamp:
May 7, 2014, 10:24:39 PM (12 years ago)
Author:
Mark Huber
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • MDdeeptest_pixrej_20140403

    v18 v19  
    99A related issue also to be addressed is the ratty edge of the MD stacks due to poorer edge chips and smaller number of input pixels. Possible alternatives for a solution are
    1010 * hard cut by radius field by field and filter -- difficult to implement
    11  * combine MD+3PI to help improve by including better 3PI pixels -- non-trivial setup and unknown configs for both types of data sets
     11 * combine MD+3PI to help improve by including better 3PI pixels -- non-trivial setup and unknown config behavior for both types of data sets (MD and 3PI)
    1212 * only include pixel if N input > some minimum, similar to the SAFE (N=2) option but with a larger N minimum -- edge may  vary greatly between filters
    1313 * often edge is dominated by SUSPECT mask pixels, set those to bad and reject -- potential to impact entire skycell (may be good since SUSPECT may actually be bad)
    1414 * any others options?
    1515
     16The bugs found will apply to all stacks (MD and 3PI).
     17
     18Changes are noted in the [wiki:MDdeeptest_pixrej_20140403#ConfigurationMods] section for the MD deep stacks only (so far, suspect will be necessary for refstacks but unclear how night stacks will configured as of yet).
     19
    1620
    1721----
     
    1923= Example Junk and Bugs =
    2024
    21 Large regions of high level, bad pixels ( md04s065i -- diffract spike chunks (1129,4256), the moth () ) -- bug
     25Large regions of high level, bad pixels ( md04s065i -- diffract spike chunks (1129,4256), the moth (2193,2062) ) -- bug
    2226
    2327|| img || mk || wt || num || exp || expwt ||
     
    3741[[Image(md04s065i_stackjunk_crlike_2_ds9.jpg,300px)]]
    3842
    39  * due to bug, showing up after NAN/0 bug fixed, sigma sometimes being set to a negative value resulting in final mean and sigma going NAN (then all inputs again used...)
    40 
    41 
    42 Large region of low level, poor/bad pixels ( md04s013g () ) -- bug? much can be reduced by config mods
     43 * due to bug, showing up more after NAN/0 bug fixed, sigma sometimes being set to a negative value resulting in final mean and sigma going NAN (then all inputs again used...)
     44
     45
     46Large region of low level, poor/bad pixels ( md04s013g (1090,5600), md09s013g (1090,5600) ) -- bug? much can be reduced by config mods
    4347
    4448|| img || mk || num || wt ||
     
    4650[[Image(md04s013g_stackjunk_1_ds9.jpg,600px)]]
    4751
    48  * greatly reduced by lowering THRESHOLD.MASK 0.5->0.01 (may need further modifications)
    49 
    50 
    51 Edge junk and ''pomegranate-like webbing'' ( md04s013g (), md09s012g extensive () ) -- bug? much can be reduced by config mods and added N input minimum per pixel (NMINPIX)
     52 * greatly reduced by lowering THRESHOLD.MASK 0.5->0.01 (may need further modifications) or reject a set of entire inputs as poor/bad if can be identified.
     53
     54
     55Edge junk and ''webbing'' ( md04s013g (800,2850) ) -- bug? much can be reduced by config mods and added N input minimum per pixel (NMINPIX)
    5256
    5357|| img || mk || num || wt ||
     
    5660
    5761 * webbing greatly reduced by lowering THRESHOLD.MASK 0.5->0.3 (may need further modifications, 0.01 even better)
    58  * edge junk also cleaned up by rejecting pixels with <20 inputs (NMINPIX 20)
     62 * edge junk also cleaned up by rejecting pixels with <20 inputs (NMINPIX 20). Based on the large rise of variance values still, could probably be increased 30-50 inputs generally.
    5963
    6064[[Image(md04s013g_stackjunk_edgepom_2_n20thr03_ds9.jpg,600px)]]
     
    6266
    6367
    64 
    65 Other case of ''pomegranate-like webbing'' (md09s ) -- different cause, appears to be incomplete rejection of bright, scattered light. Bug? Lower threshold (THRESHOLD.MASK) helps, but likely need to reject a set of entire inputs as poor/bad.
     68Other case of ''webbing'' (md09s012g (1421,4850) ) -- different cause, appears to be incomplete rejection of bright, scattered light. Bug? Lower threshold (THRESHOLD.MASK) helps, but likely need to reject a set of entire inputs as poor/bad.
    6669
    6770[[Image(.jpg,600px)]]
    6871
    6972
    70 Setting SUSPECT input pixels as bad --
    71 
    72 [[Image(.jpg,600px)]]
    73 
    74 Other streak-like features still (md09s00g () ) -- another bug? Lower threshold (THRESHOLD.MASK) helps but not always.
     73
     74
     75Other streak-like features still (md09s046g (3235,3368) ) -- suspect another bug. Lower threshold (THRESHOLD.MASK) helps but not completely.
     76
     77[[Image(md09s046g_suspectbadstreakthres03to01_x3235y3368.jpg,600px)]]
    7578
    7679
    7780Edge of skycell junk -- strip along skycell with fair amount of junk ignored, kernel size (all stacks have this problem)
    7881 * KERNEL.SIZE=20 pixels, MD.V3 skycell overlap is 320 pixels -- this area should just be entirely MASKED
     82
     83[[Image(md09s046g_badbordermask_x6387y2110.jpg,600px)]]
     84
     85
     86
     87Setting SUSPECT input pixels as bad -- general input loss per pixel ~1-5% over the field but more often than not with shapes that are clearly poor (i.e. ghost rings)
    7988
    8089[[Image(.jpg,600px)]]
     
    126135
    127136
    128 __MD09 example as a shifted center field case__ -- pre-test showed a large amount of junk, so also set SUSPECT input pixels as BAD pixels, edge properties unknown so keep pixels N>10 inputs (NMINPIX)
     137__MD09 example as a shifted center field case__ -- [wiki:MD09.PV1_deepstack_tests] and manual re-test showed a large amount of junk, so also set SUSPECT input pixels as BAD pixels, edge properties unknown so keep pixels N>10 inputs (NMINPIX)
    129138 * label: MD09.cut2009n10suspectbaddeeptest.20140427 -- g-band only, full PV2 set after 6/2010 like cut2009
    130139 * THRESHOLD.MASK  0.3
     
    185194 * THRESHOLD.MASK lower to 0.1
    186195
    187 New options added:
     196New options added (defaults):
    188197{{{
    189 NMINPIX         S32     30              # Minimum input per pixel
    190 MASK.BLANKBORDER S32    20              # Mask blank border in final stack output
     198NMINPIX         S32     1              # Minimum input per pixel
     199MASK.BLANKBORDER S32    0              # Mask blank border in final stack output
    191200}}}
    192201 * NMINPIX 30 appears to be a reasonable starting value, may be better if 40-50. The edges of the MD field is poor, 3PI overlap in that area will often be better.