Changes between Version 39 and Version 40 of MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004
- Timestamp:
- Nov 15, 2012, 11:09:30 AM (14 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004
v39 v40 46 46 {{{ 47 47 IPP_IDET CAL_PSF_MAG CAL_PSF_MAG_SIG PSF_INST_MAG PSF_INST_MAG_SIG AP_MAG PSF_MAJOR PSF_QF_PERFECT FLAGS FLAGS2 DIFF_NRATIO_BAD rsep (") 48 48 ---- o6157g0218o 49 49 2385003229.gpc1:MD10.nightlyscience:2012:08:18:MD10.V3:skycell.052:MD10.V3.skycell.052.WS.dif.272923.cmf 50 50 00180 17.159 0.000 -12.106 0.055 -12.059 6.915 0.999 0x02200001 0x00000881 0.59 0.00 51 51 ---- o6157g0219o 52 52 2385006586.gpc1:MD10.nightlyscience:2012:08:18:MD10.V3:skycell.052:MD10.V3.skycell.052.WS.dif.272924.cmf 53 53 00143 16.543 0.000 -12.720 0.051 -12.072 10.512 0.999 0x02200001 0x00000081 0.61 0.00 … … 57 57 58 58 Manually rerunning WSdiffims: 59 * conv direction correct (default is conv refstack)?Yes according the inputs from ppSub logs (conv refstack only, unconv better by ~1 pixel), and Kron R measure appears similar on resampled warp to SMF PSF size.59 * conv direction correct? (default is conv refstack) Yes according the inputs from ppSub logs (conv refstack only, unconv better by ~1 pixel), and Kron R measure appears similar on resampled warp to SMF PSF size. 60 60 {{{ 61 61 ---- o6157g0218o
