Changes between Version 154 and Version 155 of MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004

Timestamp:

Mar 11, 2013, 1:20:04 PM (13 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004

@@ -21 +21 @@
 Various other minor(?) issues identified:
  * background binning for photometry on diffims has not been the same as other photometry (~0.1-0.2 offset mag) -- using 128 for now, may need additional/proper tuning
- * psphot trace level >5 modifies the photometry output -- not operation still to be fixed
- * refConv outputs aren't needed since magic not used -- turning off in gpc1/psphot.config -- hard coded in --
+ * psphot trace level >5 modifies the photometry output -- [ticket:1510 ticket 1510] -- to be fixed
+ * refConv outputs aren't needed since magic not used, turn off? not an option in gpc1/psphot.config etc -- hard coded in diff_skycell.pl and would need option to tie to if general use on/off or with magic..
+  * normally only made in original nightly processing, then cleaned up and not remade on update
   * This output highlighted another possible problem in the COMP_WT output where the range is insufficient and cores of moderately bright sources are clipped to NAN -- unknown extent or if critial and how to fix, [ticket:1514 ticket 1514]
- * ppSub missing -threads option in help -- to be fixed
+ * ppSub missing -threads option and many others in help -- see psphot help for the more generic options.. should be unified..
  * sometimes a check is made for a single input list of sources (input or ref) and allowed with the one provided being the master source list, other places if either doesn't exist then ppSub exits so that sources for both must be provided -- unclear if one source list is acceptable for all parts, still to be addressed
- * REVERSE is wanted as a command line argument and not defined for choosing if the input or the reference is used to determine the PSF for photometry on the diffim -- ever necessary?
+ * REVERSE is wanted as a command line argument and not defined for choosing if the input or the reference is used to determine the PSF for photometry on the diffim -- this ever necessary?
  * is convolved refstack really necessary here or would the unconvolved stack be better (basically the refstack is just sky for moving objects but for other transient science may want unconvolved) as the unconvolved stack is typically of better FWHM and requires less deconvolution to the warp seeing -- needs to be investigated further
  * psphot run on diffim compared to ppSub photometry does not necessarily agree -- unclear still if config/setup or actual problem/bug
 
 For results using only a matched list and a background binning, see [wiki:MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004#Largesamplediffimphotometryfory-band]
-
 == Issue of photometry offset ==