Changes between Version 116 and Version 117 of MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004

Timestamp:

Feb 28, 2013, 11:09:10 AM (13 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004

@@ -32 +32 @@
 == Issue of photometry offset ==
 
-Exposure (SMF) photometry versus diffim photometry: unless the target is contaminated with background (self or host), photometry at the exposure level will be the better choice for photometry. To test, a large sample will need to be run, like the MD09 event. 
+Exposure (SMF) photometry versus diffim photometry: unless the target is contaminated with background (self or host), photometry at the exposure level will be the better choice for photometry. However, look at the MD09 example since covers past/present, most warps are still available (MD09 is the current test field), and does not appear intrinsically variable.
 
 
@@ -580 +580 @@
 
 
+== Full sample diffim photometry for y-band ==
+With fix-A applied:
+
+
 
 = Example: MD01, MBA 131130  (Alan Fitzsimmons) = 
@@ -688 +692 @@
 
 = Example (needed): SSdiffim photometry for transients =
-
-
-
+Do any of the modifications impact the photometry from the SSdiffims critical for the static transient use?
+
+
+