Changes between Version 10 and Version 11 of MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004

Timestamp:

Nov 1, 2012, 5:52:55 PM (14 years ago)

Author:

asteroidnerd

Comment:

--

MD_WSdiffim_photcheck_test20121004

@@ -42 +42 @@
 }}}
 
-Although this is the best example in the database because of the density of measurements and the known small amplitude of any lightcurve, we may be misled because of the slow motion of the object causing problems in brightness measurements. But this will only occur if MOPS is being fed warp-warp measurements instead of warp-stack, and it should make the object fainter, not brighter as seen. The variation in z-band and in other filters in 2012 is also puzzling:
+Although this is the best example in the database because of the density of measurements and the known small amplitude of any lightcurve, we may be misled because of the slow motion of the object causing problems in brightness measurements. But this should not only occur if MOPS is being fed warp-stack measurements, and it should make the object fainter not brighter as seen. The variation in z-band and in other filters in 2012 is also puzzling.
 
 Plot of observed magnitudes converted to V (top), and residual of magnitude (observed - predicted), in 2011 and 2012:
@@ -52 +52 @@
 == Example: MD01, MBA 131130  (Alan Fitzsimmons) == 
 
-This is a nice example of the offset plus  large scatter in y-band for a Main Belt Asteroid seen this year.
+This is a nice example of the offset plus large scatter in y-band for a Main Belt Asteroid seen this year.
 {{{
 o6169g0184o 36.353429    -4.350323