Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of MD09.refstack.20130613

Timestamp:

Jun 16, 2013, 5:58:23 PM (13 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

MD09.refstack.20130613

@@ -15 +15 @@
 
 
-|| '''Filter''' || '''N total''' || '''N FWHM<8 pixels''' ||  '''N (FWHM<8 pixels for 2012''' ||
+|| '''Filter''' || '''N total''' || '''N FWHM<8 pixels''' ||  '''N (FWHM<8 pixels for 2012''' || '''N FWHM<6 pixels''' ||  '''N (FWHM<6 pixels for 2012''' ||
 || || || || ||
-|| g || 
-|| r ||  
-|| i ||  
-|| z || 
-|| y || 
+|| g || 578 || 535 || 94 || 436 || 64 ||
+|| r || 567 || 540 || 97 || 474 || 70 ||
+|| i ||  581 || 554 || 107 || 497 || 93 ||
+|| z || 645 || 619 || 147 || 584 || 125 ||
+|| y || 540 || 475 || 201 || 380 || 122 ||
 || || || || ||
  * 2012 wasn't a great season for MD09 either (like MD08)
@@ -30 +30 @@
  * 04/14 reftests finished, full refstack started
  * 04/15 refstack finished, checked and problem skycells found/fixed if possible. staticsky single filter only finished and mappings started
- * 04/16? mappings finished, reftest+refstack to distribution
+ * 04/16 mappings finished, reftest+refstack to distribution
  * 04/19? refstack setup, recently missed exposures setup for diffims
 
@@ -90 +90 @@
  * some convolved stacks have poorer FWHM PSF but not significant enough to be likely improved by reprocessing using DEEP_STACK config as in earlier MD fields
  * g,i in particular seems to vaguely show the arc of shallower depth but no where close to what last year's refstack had?
- * skycell details: 
-  * y: 
-  * z:
-  * i: 
-  * r: 
-  * g:
-
-
+ * skycell notes: 
+  * y: s023,24,036,046,056 cell pattern; s060 conv prob; s068,071 high rej -- s060,071 replaced
+  * z: s035 odd print through; s050 conv prob; s068 high rej % -- s050 replaced
+  * i: s082 conv prob -- s082 replaced
+  * r: s012 conv prob; s030,038 poor/conv prob -- s012,030,038 replaced
+  * g: s012,030,050 conv prob; s021 poor; s024,027,032,033,037,065 strong ghost; s046 cell pattern -- s012,030,050,021 replaced
 
 Core coverage  -- one of the larger shifted pointings so very different from normal distribution of skycells (also see detection efficiency maps below)
 {{{
+082-086
+071-077
+060-068
+050-058
+040-048
+030-038
+021-027
+012-016
 }}}
- * skycells with fewer inputs:  ;   ~50% or less 
+ * skycells with fewer inputs: (016g), 030, 038, 060, 068  , many more edge skycells in y-band;  all ~50% or more