Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of MD07.refstack.20130102

Timestamp:

Jan 9, 2013, 10:20:05 PM (14 years ago)

Author:

Mark Huber

Comment:

--

MD07.refstack.20130102

@@ -5 +5 @@
 
 MD07 observations:
- * starting end December 2012  
- * early January 2012 through mid-June 2012 
- * early January 2011 through end June 2011
- * end December 2009 through end June 2010
- * early April 2009 through end June 2009
+ * starting end January 2013? 
+ * mid-January 2012 through end June 2012 
+ * early February 2011 through mid-July 2011
+ * mid-January 2010 through early August 2010
+ * early April 2009 through mid-end July 2009
 
 
 || '''Filter''' || '''N total''' || '''N FWHM<8 pixels''' ||  '''N (FWHM<8 pixels for 2011/2012''' ||
 || || || || ||
-|| g || 
-|| r || 
-|| i || 
-|| z || 
-|| y || 
+|| g || 565 || 472 || 128 ||
+|| r ||  564 || 488 || 118 ||
+|| i ||  739 || 667 || 172 ||
+|| z || 739 || 667 || 172 ||
+|| y || 535 || 483 || 114 ||
 || || || || ||
 
@@ -25 +25 @@
  * 01/02/13 selected exposure reprocessing chip->warp for refstack started
  * 01/03 reftests finished, full refstack started
- * 01/05 refstack finished, checked.  staticsky single filter only running
- * 01/06 mappings made, reftest+refstack to distribution, refstack setup
+ * 01/06 refstack finished, checked and problem skycells found.  
+ * 01/08 staticsky single filter only finished
+ * 01/09 mappings finished, reftest+refstack to distribution, refstack setup
 
 
@@ -42 +43 @@
 Histograms of the FWHM major and minor and elongation from camera stage value (full exposure) for the sample of reprocessed exposures (red) and used for refstack.20130102 (top blue) and used for refstack.20111106 (bottom blue) in grizy order 
 
-|| [[Image(.g.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || [[Image(.r.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || [[Image(.i.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || 
-|| [[Image(.z.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || [[Image(.y.expfwhm.png,300px)]] ||   ||
+|| [[Image(MD07.refstack.20130102-MD07.refstack.20130102.s055-MD07.refstack.20111106.s055.g.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || [[Image(MD07.refstack.20130102-MD07.refstack.20130102.s055-MD07.refstack.20111106.s055.r.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || [[Image(MD07.refstack.20130102-MD07.refstack.20130102.s055-MD07.refstack.20111106.s055.i.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || 
+|| [[Image(MD07.refstack.20130102-MD07.refstack.20130102.s055-MD07.refstack.20111106.s055.z.expfwhm.png,300px)]] || [[Image(MD07.refstack.20130102-MD07.refstack.20130102.s055-MD07.refstack.20111106.s055.y.expfwhm.png,300px)]] ||   ||
 
 
@@ -113 +114 @@
 
 == Problems  ==
- * generally edge skycells have issues, need better containment of those still. (see core coverage below).
+ * generally edge skycells have issues, need better containment of those still. (see core coverage below). g,r has additionally ratty edge skycells. 
  * like others, greater % of inputs rejected (20-30%) so per pixel input is less, but still of order 30 inputs per pixel
  * some convolved stacks have poorer FWHM PSF but not significant enough to be likely improved by reprocessing using DEEP_STACK config as in earlier MD fields.
+ * as this is a field with a large center offset, the center is more contained in skycell.044 and has the degraded FWHM in gri 
+
  * skycell.087 in y,z,i may be odd. skycell.028 in g-band likely undersampled.
  * appears sky in some edge skycells my have offset.
@@ -122 +125 @@
  * misc clusters of ghosts in g-band (046,052,053,061), some in r-band (042)
 
-Core coverage is the default set 
-{{
-82-87
-x1-x8
-12-17
+ * occasional edge higher but not too excessive except s083r, and a bit s011i, s017g; terrible gri center s044 likely since all in 1 skycell and not split over 2-4
+ * skycell details: 
+  * y: s032,042,052,062,063,083 cell print through problem; s034 bright junk; s044 center/dither spot; s003,004,040 cell odd/bright chunks on edge
+  * z: s005,006,040 undersampled, messy edge; s034,062 bright junk
+  * i: s006,040 undersampled, messy edge; s015,034,062 (057 less) bright junk
+  * r: s005,038 undersampled, messy edge; s003,031,032,033,037,045,051,053, and more ghosts; s014,034,074 (057 less) bright junk; s021,022 strong scattered light
+  * g: s045 poor cell print through and ghosts; s013,034,037,047,054,057(less),064,073,074(bad),s084 bright junk; ; s003,004,017,038,050,068,071,077 undersampled, messy edge; s051,055 strong, s024,042,066,067,072 smeared, 021, ghosts; s021,022 scattered light;
+
+
+
+Core coverage is the default set -- one of the larger shifted pointings so very different from normal distribution of skycells (also see detection efficiency maps below)
+{{{
+083--086
+071--077
+061--068
+050--058
+040--048
+030--038
+021--028
+011--017
+003--005
 }}}
- * weaker (fewer inputs) for 012,017,021,028,071,078,082,087 in various filters  
+ * skycells with fewer inputs: 003,028,068,086; 011,028,071 <50% 
+
 
 
@@ -134 +154 @@
 Refstacks run through the staticsky (single filter mode so basic psphot with deteff measurements) and skycal stage on the unconvolved stacks to make the map plots (full 5 filter version still having occasional faults to work through):
  * label: MD07.refstack.20130102, MD07.refstack.20130102
- * data_group:  MD07.refstack.20130102.1x20130105, MD07.refstack.20130102.1x20130105.cal20130105
+ * data_group:  MD07.refstack.20130102.1x20130108, MD07.refstack.20130102.1x20130108.cal20130108