| 233 | | |
| 234 | | |
| 235 | | ---- |
| | 233 | == Problems == |
| | 234 | * all pretty much the same as with the ISIS convolved stacks, though, the 1D appears to be stronger |
| | 235 | * some convolved stacks have poorer FWHM PSF but not significant enough to be likely improved by reprocessing using MD_DEEP_STACK config as in earlier MD fields (input cut <10 rather than <6 and FWHM+100*STDEV rather than FWHM+1.0*STDEV) |
| | 236 | * g: |
| | 237 | * re-processing tests (have not written this up before and should note): |
| | 238 | * data_group -- MD01.refstack.20130731redo |
| | 239 | * workdir base -- MD01.refstack.20130731redo |
| | 240 | * unused redo processing |
| | 241 | * label -- MD01.refstack.20130731skip |
| | 242 | * data_group -- MD01.refstack.20130731redo |
| | 243 | * workdir base -- MD01.refstack.20130731redo |
| | 244 | * replaced original run |
| | 245 | * label -- MD01.refstack.20130731poor |
| | 246 | * data_group -- MD01.refstack.20130731poor |
| | 247 | * workdir base -- original name MD01.refstack.20130731 |
| | 248 | * redo processing replacing original processing |
| | 249 | * label -- normal refstack label |
| | 250 | * data_group -- normal refstack data_group |
| | 251 | * workdir base -- MD01.refstack.20130731redo |
| | 252 | |
| | 253 | |
| | 254 | Core coverage -- again same as default ISIS method above |
| | 255 | |
| | 256 | |
| | 257 | == Refstack Summary == |
| | 258 | Stack phomtometry on the refstacks done through the staticsky and skycal stages using the unconvolved images |
| | 259 | * single filter mode so basic psphot with deteff measurements that has the zero-point recalculated for the test plots below |
| | 260 | * label: MD02.refstack.20130815, MD02.refstack.20130815 |
| | 261 | * data_group (single filter): MD02.refstack.20130815.1x20130821, MD02.refstack.20130815.1x20130821.cal20130821 |
| | 262 | * multi-filter (Nx) not run yet |
| | 263 | * label: |
| | 264 | * data_group: (all skycells have 5 filters matched) |
| | 265 | * on datastore under ps1-md-staticsky, but only the staticsky version, the skycal product still has no method for distribution |
| | 266 | |
| | 267 | |
| | 268 | Source photometry psf_major,_minor maps (grizy): '''all new plots here scaled by root(2) to match past scaling (plots now labelled accordingly) and so values larger by root(2) to what should actually be''' |
| | 269 | |
| | 270 | || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_g.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_r.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_i.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_z.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_y.txt_psfmap.png,300px)]] || |
| | 271 | |
| | 272 | |
| | 273 | |
| | 274 | Magnitude of sources@5-sigma maps (grizy): |
| | 275 | |
| | 276 | || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_g.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_r.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_i.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_z.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_y.txt_mag5sigmap.png,300px)]] || |
| | 277 | |
| | 278 | |
| | 279 | |
| | 280 | Detection efficiency magnitude @50% recovery (500 fakes, grizy): '''0 rej for all now that the SCL_ keyword has its true value other than 1. when rejected in stacking''' |
| | 281 | |
| | 282 | || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_g.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_r.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_i.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_z.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(md02v2013_1dgx1skycal_cmf_y.txt_mag50gridmap.png,300px)]] || |
| | 283 | |
| | 284 | |
| | 285 | |
| | 286 | ---- |