| 491 | | * overshot the number of input warps compared to V2. The average PSF FWHM_major seems much better than expected from the histograms of input exposures. [[Image(MD03.20111010_g_test.png,300px)]] |
| 492 | | |
| 493 | | Troubled skycells: none in initial inspection. Far outer edges with few dithers may/may not have successful skycells. Sample skycell coverage map by good_frac with N input warps, N rejected warps, dtime_script for making stack, and flag any quality error that rejects an entire skycell (ERR). The ~110-125 input warps provided a sample for some of the far outer skycells from earlier dithers to be covered still. |
| 494 | | [[Image(MD03.refstack.20101202.NULL.g.00000.stksummap.png,300px)]] [[Image(MD03.refstack.20111010.NULL.g.00000.stksummap.png,300px)]] |
| | 490 | * overshot the number of input warps compared to V2. The average PSF FWHM_major seems much better than expected from the histograms (above) of input exposures. |
| | 491 | |
| | 492 | [[Image(MD03.20111010_g_test.png,300px)]] |
| | 493 | |
| | 494 | Troubled skycells: none on initial inspection. Far outer edges with few dithers may/may not have successful skycells. Sample skycell coverage maps for V2 and V3 with good_frac with N input warps, N rejected warps, dtime_script for making stack, and flag of any quality error that rejects an entire skycell (ERR). The ~110-125 input warps provided a sample for some of the far outer skycells from earlier dithers to be covered still. |
| | 495 | || [[Image(MD03.refstack.20101202.NULL.g.00000.stksummap.png,300px)]] || [[Image(MD03.refstack.20111010.NULL.g.00000.stksummap.png,300px)]] || |