| | 58 | * Dark studies: http://svn.pan-starrs.ifa.hawaii.edu/trac/ipp/wiki/Background_Dark_Model |
| | 59 | * Noisemap/false positive studies: |
| | 60 | * Changing the binning areas in the noisemap changes the results, but not in a dramatic way that would account for the observed remaining false positive results. |
| | 61 | * Confirmed that as the noise increases in a noisemap cell, it also becomes increasingly non-Gaussian. However, it does not seem to be so non-Gaussian as to explain the false positive rate. |
| | 62 | * Looked at the trend of false positives with changes in detector GAIN. This works in the way we want, but although the cells with presumed bad gain values have a higher false positive rate, the small number of these cells prevents them from having the majority of the false positives. |
| | 63 | * Confirmed that the false positive rate decreases dramatically if we enforce a 5-sigma detection limit on measurements. |
| | 64 | * Change to psastro to record reference catalog name in the PSREFCAT header keyword. |
| | 65 | * Confirmed date range for various dark/noisemap changes, and queued new detrends to match those changes. |
| | 66 | * Confirmed that the A/B mode dark variations do not correspond to the status of the glycol. |
