| | 5 | |
| | 6 | == KPAT / DRAVG Priority Issues (+ Notes) == |
| | 7 | |
| | 8 | * latency |
| | 9 | * we have performed a [wiki:ThroughputDemo_20091104 throughput demonstration] which meets requirements. |
| | 10 | |
| | 11 | * magic masking |
| | 12 | * the latest large-scale run had a median streak count of 8. |
| | 13 | * we need to make an assessment of the current state of masking by masking bit (both warp and chip) |
| | 14 | |
| | 15 | * stacking: noise correlation |
| | 16 | * we believe this has been addressed by Paul's recent work |
| | 17 | * we need to create a set of examples for evaluation. |
| | 18 | * This is a high priority for this week (2009.11.09) |
| | 19 | |
| | 20 | * diffims: residuals and noise correlation |
| | 21 | * we have made some good progress on this with the dual convolution technique, and will generate a set of test images this week. |
| | 22 | * another significant source of residuals comes from poor astrometry |
| | 23 | * we also also working on improving the quality of the detection analysis and the associated photometry in the diff images |
| | 24 | |
| | 25 | * astrometry: some catastrophic failures (offsets>3") |
| | 26 | * some progress made in some extreme fields (M42). this may also result in improvements in other poor situations. otherwise under investigation. |
| | 27 | |
| | 28 | * xtalk artifacts. |
| | 29 | * for the near term, we will address this by masking the worst offenders in the camera masking stage. |
| | 30 | * still need to pin down the xtalk rules, but we can implement the xtalk we know. |
| | 31 | |
| | 32 | * other image artifacts. |
| | 33 | |
| | 34 | == Other Near-Term Goals == |
| | 35 | |
| | 36 | * address warp failures |
| | 37 | * address camera failure |
| | 38 | * address remaining stack concerns |
| | 39 | * demo of diffs with dual conv -- !ThreePi Southern Region again |
| | 40 | * add xtalk masking & correction -- needs feedback from camera |
| | 41 | * someone needs to put together code that feeds back quality info to summit |
