| | 9 | |
| | 10 | This is a very small part of the 041 skycell stack from MD08 re-created at Durham from the |
| | 11 | released warps. Looking at the intermediary convolved warps during processing you can see |
| | 12 | that this small-scale high frequency ''mottling'' is already present, so this must be an |
| | 13 | artifact of the convolution not the combination. |
| | 14 | |
| | 15 | The representative kernels used to convolve the warps are found in the third extension of |
| | 16 | the ''.kernel'' files, and look like this: |
| | 17 | |
| | 18 | [[Image(fullkernels.png)]] |
| | 19 | |
| | 20 | Collapsing the data of the kernel along the X and Y directions and taking a single pixel slice, |
| | 21 | shows the small-scale structure responsible for the ''mottling'': |
| | 22 | |
| | 23 | [[Image(fullmeankernel.png)]] |
| | 24 | |
| | 25 | [[Image(fullslicekernel.png)]] |
| | 26 | |
| | 27 | Note that convolving an image outside of IPP with this kernel confirmed it is the source of |
| | 28 | this effect. |
| | 29 | |
| | 30 | |
| | 31 | == Improving the stack, aka removing the ''mottling'' == |
| | 32 | |
| | 33 | Inspecting each of the skycells that contribute to the stack shows a range of imperfections, |
| | 34 | some are quite serious, like double images and others less so, like trailing and low signal. |
| | 35 | In general the image quality isn't good, with most images displaying some irregularities. |
| | 36 | |
| | 37 | To improve the stack and see what effect this would have on the matching kernels I removed |
| | 38 | the images judged to be badly trailed, had double images or little signal, and re-stacked |
| | 39 | (removing 6 of 23 images). This gave the following results. For comparison the before and is |
| | 40 | shown again below the after. |
| | 41 | |
| | 42 | ---- |
| | 43 | |
| | 44 | [[Image(pickedstack.png)]] |
| | 45 | [[Image(fullstack.png)]] |
| | 46 | |
| | 47 | ---- |
| | 48 | |
| | 49 | [[Image(pickedkernels.png)]] |
| | 50 | [[Image(fullkernels.png)]] |
| | 51 | |
| | 52 | ---- |
| | 53 | |
| | 54 | [[Image(pickedmeankernel.png)]] |
| | 55 | [[Image(fullmeankernel.png)]] |
| | 56 | |
| | 57 | ---- |
| | 58 | |
| | 59 | [[Image(pickedslicekernel.png)]] |
| | 60 | [[Image(fullslicekernel.png)]] |
| | 61 | |
| | 62 | ---- |
| | 63 | |
| | 64 | It is immediately obvious that the mottling effect has been suppressed |
| | 65 | and that the matching kernels are somewhat less irregular, although still |
| | 66 | not symmetric or monotonic. This result must raise questions about the |
| | 67 | selection of warps that are selected to create a stack. |
| | 68 | |