IPP Software Navigation Tools IPP Links Communication Pan-STARRS Links

Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of DVO_GPC1_pt_2


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Apr 29, 2009, 2:42:37 AM (17 years ago)
Author:
Sebastian Jester
Comment:

reformat for trac

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • DVO_GPC1_pt_2

    v1 v2  
    55
    66=== Methods ===
     7{{{
    78 [wwoodvas@serenity gpc1] addstar -accept-astrom -D CATDIR test o4732g0168o.34857/o4732g0168o.34857.ch.2676.XY55.cmf
    89 no data in db test/Photcodes.dat
    910 directory test does not exist, creating...
    1011 SUCCESS: elapsed time    1.5099 sec for   459 stars (    0 matches),    459 average,     459 measure
    11 
     12}}}
    1213And you can load all of them with a foreach loop
    13 
     14{{{
    1415 [wwoodvas@serenity gpc1] ls gpc1
    1516 o4732g0168o.34857/
     
    3536 SUCCESS: elapsed time    0.6230 sec for   160 stars (   22 matches),  16016 average,   16452 measure
    3637 SUCCESS: elapsed time    0.6211 sec for    69 stars (    2 matches),  16083 average,   16521 measure
    37 
     38}}}
    3839Then we can look at things in DVO:
    39 
     40{{{
    4041 [wwoodvas@serenity gpc1] dvo -D CATDIR gpc1
    4142 no file /Users/wwoodvas/.dvorc
     
    5253 dvo: mextract -region ra, dec, i, i:err
    5354 dvo: czplot ra dec i 17 12 -c red -pt 7
    54 
     55}}}
    5556And here's where we see the first problem.  'i:err' is NaN for every value:
    56 
     57{{{
    5758 dvo: limits i i:err
    5859 dvo: limits
    5960 limits: 6.623180 29.526000 nan nan [-a] [-n device]
    60 
     61}}}
    6162Here we've asked the "limits" function to automatically figure out and set the limits for "i" and "i:err" (for example because we were going to plot them).  It finds that the min and max values for "i:err" are NaN, i.e., all of the values of "i:err" are NaN.  This holds true for all of the filters (griy).  A bit of further investigation reveals that all of the ra:err and dec:err values are 0, but I don't think the inputs to these values from the .cmf value are reasonable in the first place since they tend to be in the 1000s or 0 (are the units on X_PSF_SIG thousandths of a pixel or something?).
    6263