Changes between Initial Version and Version 1 of Ticket #1235
- Timestamp:
- May 4, 2009, 3:56:26 PM (17 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
Ticket #1235
- Property Keywords stamps added; substamps removed
- Property Status new → accepted
- Property Summary Increasing # of substamps → Offset around stamps with bad pixels in footprint
-
Ticket #1235 – Description
initial v1 1 The catalogs of image and template are used to get a good list of substamp candidates. Due to the masking, lots of these substamp candidates are rejected since a masked pixel is in the substamp. For sparse fields, this can lead to an unsufficient number of substamps. Fix: if a substamp candidate is rejected, check if the substamp is1 The catalogs of image and template are used to get a good list of substamp candidates. Due to the masking, lots of these substamp candidates are rejected since a masked pixel is in the substamp. For sparse fields, this can lead to an insufficient number of substamps. Fix: if a substamp candidate is rejected, check if the substamp is 2 2 acceptable if the center of the substamp is slightly moved (The object does not have to be dead center in the middle of the substamp!).
