Index: /branches/eam_branches/ipp-20111122/Ohana/src/addstar/test/relphot.flatcorr.dvo
===================================================================
--- /branches/eam_branches/ipp-20111122/Ohana/src/addstar/test/relphot.flatcorr.dvo	(revision 33158)
+++ /branches/eam_branches/ipp-20111122/Ohana/src/addstar/test/relphot.flatcorr.dvo	(revision 33159)
@@ -15,4 +15,6 @@
 
 input tap.dvo
+
+# set
 
  # set various global variables
@@ -86,4 +88,21 @@
   mksequence $fileroot $catdir
 end
+
+# go
+# ckexposure catdir.test mjd_uc[0] zpt_uc[0] raw
+# ckexposure catdir.test mjd_nc[0] zpt_nc[0] raw
+# setphot -update -ubercal testzpt.fits -D CATDIR catdir.test
+# ckexposure catdir.test mjd_uc[0] zpt_uc[0] corr
+# ckexposure catdir.test mjd_nc[0] zpt_nc[0] corr
+# relphot g -region 9.5 10.5 19.5 20.5 -update -D CATDIR catdir.test -D STAR_TOOFEW 1 -D SIGMA_LIM 0.075 -statmode MEAN
+# dvo: ckexposure catdir.test mjd_uc[0] zpt_uc[0] corr
+#  mean is now -0.42
+# dvo: ckexposure catdir.test mjd_nc[0] zpt_nc[0] corr
+#  mean is now -0.42 
+#  ** setphot assigned the zero point of the uc exposure to an effective -0.4 (ie, negative clouds), relphot was not told to keep this so it dragged the negative clouds to 0.0 -- this seems to be the right thing to do
+
+# re-run setphot, then relphot with -keep-ubercal
+
+
 
 macro ckexposure