Index: /branches/eam_branches/20090715/psphot/doc/notes.txt
===================================================================
--- /branches/eam_branches/20090715/psphot/doc/notes.txt	(revision 25652)
+++ /branches/eam_branches/20090715/psphot/doc/notes.txt	(revision 25653)
@@ -11,9 +11,11 @@
     0.01, about the same for f = 0.005
 
-  * clean up and remove test bits of code.
-
-  * clean up psphot.config files : drop unused, fix some conflicting
+  o clean up and remove test bits of code.
+
+  o clean up psphot.config files : drop unused, fix some conflicting
     names, reduce camera-specific options, make S/N limits
     consistent...
+
+  * PSF Eval & ChiSq test??
 
   * EXT fail fit?  lack of iterations?
@@ -29,6 +31,13 @@
     * is FluxScale really faster?  do we need a finer mapping? (5x5
       clearly yields too much scatter)
+    * is psphotFitSourcesLinear.c (build matrix) super-slow when optimized?
 
   * very saturated stars are somewhat segmented.
+
+  * footprint coverage in dense simtest image 005.001?
+
+  * footprint S/N limit vs peaks S/N limit?
+
+  * warning about burntool table?
 
   * is the residual map failing to be masked at the radius?